Photo Credit: AI

The following is a summary of “YouTube as a source of information for stroke rehabilitation: a cross-sectional analysis of quality and reliability of videos,” published in the March 2025 issue of Rheumatology International by Assylbek et al. 

Optimizing SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 RA prescribing in high-risk patients with diabetes: a Department of Veterans Affairs quality improvement intervention

YouTube’s growing popularity raises concerns about the quality and reliability of health-related videos, including stroke rehabilitation content. 

Researchers conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on stroke rehabilitation. 

They listed videos on December 17, 2024, using four query terms and selected 72 videos based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. They evaluated videos using Global Quality Scale (GQS), Modified DISCERN, JAMA Benchmark Criteria, and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audio/Visual Materials (PEMAT-A/V), capturing key components and comparing quality classifications. 

The results showed that of 72 videos, 29.2% (n=21) were low quality, 20.8% (n=15) intermediate, and 50% (n=36) high quality. High-quality videos were mostly from academic medical centers (77.8%) and nonphysician healthcare professionals (59.4%), while low-quality ones came from independent users (100%) and TV channels (66.7%). Quality groups differed significantly in daily views, likes, and comments (P<0.05). The lowest scores were in the low-quality group. Strong correlations between GQS and other tools (P<0.001) confirmed evaluation consistency. 

Investigators found YouTube to be a valuable instructional tool for stroke rehabilitation, but inconsistencies in quality highlighted the need for better content control and evidence-based resources. They emphasized collaboration among academics, healthcare professionals, and content creators to improve educational value. 

Source: link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00296-025-05832-4