Recent work has suggested that outcomes among heart transplant patients listed at the lower-urgency (United Network for Organ Sharing Status 4 or 6) status may not be significantly impacted by donor comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to investigate outcomes of extended criteria donors (ECD) in lower vs. higher urgency patients undergoing heart transplantation.
The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for all adult patients undergoing heart transplantation from 10/18/2018 through 12/31/2021. Patients were stratified by degree of urgency (higher urgency: UNOS 1 or 2 vs. lower urgency: UNOS 4 or 6) and receipt of ECD hearts, as defined by donor hearts failing to meet established acceptable use criteria. Outcomes were compared using propensity score matched cohorts.
Among 9,160 patients included, 2,320 (25.4%) were low urgency. ECD hearts were used in 35.5% of HU patients and 39.2% of LU patients. While ECD hearts had an impact on survival among high-urgency patients (p0.05) found among low urgency patients receiving ECD vs. standard hearts. Neither ECDs nor individual ECD criteria were independently associated with mortality in low urgency patients (p>0.05).
Post-transplant outcomes among low urgency patients are not adversely affected by receipt of ECD vs. standard hearts. Expanding the available donor pool by optimizing use of ECDs in this population may increase transplant frequency, decrease waitlist morbidity, and improve postoperative outcomes for the transplant community at large.
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.
