This study aimed to compare the characteristics of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with non-TNBC on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and synthetic MRI.
This retrospective study included 79 patients with histopathologically proven breast cancer (TNBC: 16, non-TNBC: 63) who underwent synthetic MRI. Using synthetic MR images, we obtained T1 and T2 relaxation times in breast lesions before (Pre-T1, Pre-T2, Pre-PD) and after (Gd-T1, Gd-T2, Gd-PD) contrast agent injection. Subsequently, we calculated the ΔT1 (Pre-T1 – Gd-T1), ΔT2 (Pre-T2 – Gd-T2), Pre-T1/T2, and Gd-T1/T2. We compared the aforementioned quantitative values, as well as several morphologic features between TNBCs and non-TNBCs that were identified on DCE-MRI.
The multivariate analyses revealed that the Pre-T2 (P = 0.037) and the presence of rim enhancement (P-RIM) (P = 0.034) were significant and independent predictors of TNBC. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for all breast cancers was greater when a combination of Pre-T2 and P-RIM (Pre-T2+P-RIM; Method 3, AUC (area under the curve) = 0.858) was used to distinguish between TNBCs and non-TNBCs versus the use of either Pre-T2 alone (Method 1, AUC = 0.786) or P-RIM alone (Method 2, AUC = 0.747).
Pre-T2 obtained using synthetic MRI and P-RIM identified on DCE-MRI allowed the differentiation between TNBCs and non-TNBCs. However, these results are preliminary and need to be verified by further studies.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
About The Expert
Megumi Matsuda
Takaharu Tsuda
Rui Ebihara
Wataru Toshimori
Kanako Okada
Shiori Takeda
Aya Okumura
Yasuhiro Shiraishi
Hiroshi Suekuni
Yoshiaki Kamei
Mie Kurata
Riko Kitazawa
Teruhito Mochizuki
Teruhito Kido
References
PubMed